Navajo vs Welsh Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Navajo
Welsh
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Navajo
Welsh
11.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Welsh Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,988,346 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 518,114,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 173.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Welsh |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 57.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.1% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 13.6% |
| Median | 12.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 20.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pima (11.4%, a difference of 3.9%), Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 5.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 6.6%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 8.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |