Immigrants from Canada vs Welsh Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Welsh
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Welsh
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Welsh Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,127,885 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 518,114,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Welsh |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.6% | 96.7% |
Mean | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada and Welsh by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and French (4.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |