Mongolian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Western Asia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Western Asia
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,084,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Western Asia |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 6.4% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 53.6% |
| Range | 43.6% | 47.2% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 20.1% |
| Median | 19.2% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Western Asia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |