Maltese vs Immigrants from Bolivia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from Bolivia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Bolivia
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Bolivia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,419,200 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.5% |
| Range | 96.7% | 78.9% |
| Mean | 25.4% | 19.6% |
| Median | 17.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Bolivia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |