Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Osage Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Osage
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Osage
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Osage Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,266,194 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 3.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Osage |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 36.2% | 31.5% |
| Range | 29.7% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 14.9% |
| Median | 15.8% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Osage by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |