Central American vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
South American Indians
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 65.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.4% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 25.2% | 31.1% |
| Median | 23.0% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 25.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |