Central American vs Alaska Native Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Alaska Native
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Alaska Natives
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Alaska Native Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,522,237 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Alaska Native |
Minimum | 2.9% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 65.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.4% | 91.7% |
Mean | 25.2% | 32.1% |
Median | 23.0% | 24.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 44.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Alaska Natives by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |