Central American vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Central American
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Central Americans
South American Indians
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.77%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 27.7% |
| Range | 15.5% | 23.4% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 13.3% |
| Median | 9.7% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |