Central American vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Marshallese
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Marshallese |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 65.2% | 56.5% |
| Range | 62.4% | 40.3% |
| Mean | 25.2% | 28.7% |
| Median | 23.0% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 34.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |