Asian vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Asian
Croatian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Asians
Croatians
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,548,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.7% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 23.8% |
| Median | 11.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 24.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Croatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |