Bolivian vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bolivian
Croatian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bolivians
Croatians
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,239,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,548,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 4.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Croatian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 48.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.7% | 97.2% |
Mean | 12.5% | 23.8% |
Median | 11.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Croatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.54%), Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |