Asian vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Asian
Bhutanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Asians
Bhutanese
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,391,232 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 7.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 38.7% |
| Range | 36.7% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 11.7% |
| Median | 11.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Bhutanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.1%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |