Asian vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Asian
Latvian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Asians
Latvians
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.7% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 20.0% |
| Median | 11.4% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 20.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Latvians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |