Immigrants from Congo vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Croatian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Croatians
22.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,922,070 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,548,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 60.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Croatian |
Minimum | 7.9% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.8% | 97.2% |
Mean | 26.1% | 23.8% |
Median | 22.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 24.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |