Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.Beach77.0%34.8%(+42.2)#133.4%(+43.6)#28
2.Carson70.5%34.8%(+35.7)#233.4%(+37.1)#106
3.Munich69.8%34.8%(+35.0)#333.4%(+36.4)#120
4.Stanton68.5%34.8%(+33.7)#433.4%(+35.1)#163
5.Bowbells67.7%34.8%(+32.9)#533.4%(+34.3)#194
6.Lakota66.1%34.8%(+31.3)#633.4%(+32.7)#289
7.Buchanan65.2%34.8%(+30.4)#733.4%(+31.8)#344
8.Fairmount64.5%34.8%(+29.7)#833.4%(+31.1)#382
9.Fessenden64.0%34.8%(+29.2)#933.4%(+30.6)#421
10.Golva63.1%34.8%(+28.3)#1033.4%(+29.7)#505
11.Drayton62.7%34.8%(+27.9)#1133.4%(+29.3)#529
12.Rugby62.5%34.8%(+27.7)#1233.4%(+29.1)#541
13.Richardton62.5%34.8%(+27.7)#1333.4%(+29.1)#546
14.Elgin61.9%34.8%(+27.1)#1433.4%(+28.5)#618
15.Drake61.6%34.8%(+26.8)#1533.4%(+28.2)#643
16.Grandin61.5%34.8%(+26.7)#1633.4%(+28.1)#663
17.Portal61.5%34.8%(+26.7)#1733.4%(+28.1)#664
18.Lehr61.5%34.8%(+26.7)#1833.4%(+28.1)#666
19.Hebron61.3%34.8%(+26.5)#1933.4%(+27.9)#692
20.Hannaford61.0%34.8%(+26.2)#2033.4%(+27.6)#731
21.Ashley60.5%34.8%(+25.7)#2133.4%(+27.1)#785
22.Maddock60.5%34.8%(+25.7)#2233.4%(+27.1)#789
23.Lisbon60.1%34.8%(+25.3)#2333.4%(+26.7)#859
24.Medina59.5%34.8%(+24.7)#2433.4%(+26.1)#930
25.Wyndmere59.3%34.8%(+24.5)#2533.4%(+25.9)#962
26.Flasher58.5%34.8%(+23.7)#2633.4%(+25.1)#1,092
27.Mandaree58.4%34.8%(+23.6)#2733.4%(+25.0)#1,112
28.Sherwood58.3%34.8%(+23.5)#2833.4%(+24.9)#1,132
29.Pick City58.3%34.8%(+23.5)#2933.4%(+24.9)#1,134
30.Berthold57.8%34.8%(+23.0)#3033.4%(+24.4)#1,184
31.Esmond57.8%34.8%(+23.0)#3133.4%(+24.4)#1,187
32.Gilby57.5%34.8%(+22.7)#3233.4%(+24.1)#1,239
33.Edgeley56.3%34.8%(+21.5)#3333.4%(+22.9)#1,458
34.Washburn56.2%34.8%(+21.4)#3433.4%(+22.8)#1,475
35.Gackle55.7%34.8%(+20.9)#3533.4%(+22.3)#1,533
36.Grenora55.5%34.8%(+20.7)#3633.4%(+22.1)#1,578
37.Reynolds55.2%34.8%(+20.4)#3733.4%(+21.8)#1,653
38.Turtle Lake54.2%34.8%(+19.4)#3833.4%(+20.8)#1,825
39.Kindred53.7%34.8%(+18.9)#3933.4%(+20.3)#1,892
40.Strasburg53.5%34.8%(+18.7)#4033.4%(+20.1)#1,939
41.Lansford53.5%34.8%(+18.7)#4133.4%(+20.1)#1,945
42.Streeter53.3%34.8%(+18.5)#4233.4%(+19.9)#1,984
43.Buffalo52.5%34.8%(+17.7)#4333.4%(+19.1)#2,145
44.Cando51.8%34.8%(+17.0)#4433.4%(+18.4)#2,258
45.Anamoose51.6%34.8%(+16.8)#4533.4%(+18.2)#2,287
46.Sykeston51.1%34.8%(+16.3)#4633.4%(+17.7)#2,394
47.Thompson50.5%34.8%(+15.7)#4733.4%(+17.1)#2,499
48.Arthur50.0%34.8%(+15.2)#4833.4%(+16.6)#2,615
49.Lignite49.8%34.8%(+15.0)#4933.4%(+16.4)#2,646
50.Kenmare49.3%34.8%(+14.5)#5033.4%(+15.9)#2,756
51.Glen Ullin48.3%34.8%(+13.5)#5133.4%(+14.9)#2,946
52.Lamoure48.0%34.8%(+13.2)#5233.4%(+14.6)#3,009
53.Langdon47.4%34.8%(+12.6)#5333.4%(+14.0)#3,116
54.Velva47.2%34.8%(+12.4)#5433.4%(+13.8)#3,161
55.Manvel47.0%34.8%(+12.2)#5533.4%(+13.6)#3,200
56.Bowman46.8%34.8%(+12.0)#5633.4%(+13.4)#3,219
57.Forman46.8%34.8%(+12.0)#5733.4%(+13.4)#3,221
58.Minto46.4%34.8%(+11.6)#5833.4%(+13.0)#3,298
59.Hettinger45.6%34.8%(+10.8)#5933.4%(+12.2)#3,441
60.Hatton45.6%34.8%(+10.8)#6033.4%(+12.2)#3,442
61.Stanley44.7%34.8%(+9.90)#6133.4%(+11.3)#3,636
62.Garrison44.5%34.8%(+9.70)#6233.4%(+11.1)#3,678
63.Casselton43.5%34.8%(+8.70)#6333.4%(+10.1)#3,877
64.Rolla43.2%34.8%(+8.40)#6433.4%(+9.80)#3,959
65.Hazen42.6%34.8%(+7.80)#6533.4%(+9.20)#4,064
66.Gwinner42.5%34.8%(+7.70)#6633.4%(+9.10)#4,101
67.New Town42.3%34.8%(+7.50)#6733.4%(+8.90)#4,155
68.Northwood42.3%34.8%(+7.50)#6833.4%(+8.90)#4,161
69.Killdeer42.3%34.8%(+7.50)#6933.4%(+8.90)#4,163
70.Williston41.5%34.8%(+6.70)#7033.4%(+8.10)#4,322
71.Dickinson41.3%34.8%(+6.50)#7133.4%(+7.90)#4,393
72.Hazelton41.3%34.8%(+6.50)#7233.4%(+7.90)#4,417
73.Grafton40.6%34.8%(+5.80)#7333.4%(+7.20)#4,546
74.Hankinson40.5%34.8%(+5.70)#7433.4%(+7.10)#4,585
75.Crosby40.4%34.8%(+5.60)#7533.4%(+7.00)#4,621
76.Harvey39.8%34.8%(+5.00)#7633.4%(+6.40)#4,738
77.Lidgerwood38.8%34.8%(+4.00)#7733.4%(+5.40)#4,975
78.Linton38.6%34.8%(+3.80)#7833.4%(+5.20)#5,025
79.White Shield38.5%34.8%(+3.70)#7933.4%(+5.10)#5,060
80.Dunseith38.4%34.8%(+3.60)#8033.4%(+5.00)#5,092
81.Wishek37.8%34.8%(+3.00)#8133.4%(+4.40)#5,210
82.Napoleon37.8%34.8%(+3.00)#8233.4%(+4.40)#5,211
83.Sheyenne37.7%34.8%(+2.90)#8333.4%(+4.30)#5,243
84.Mott36.8%34.8%(+2.00)#8433.4%(+3.40)#5,458
85.Westhope36.8%34.8%(+2.00)#8533.4%(+3.40)#5,463
86.Mcville36.8%34.8%(+2.00)#8633.4%(+3.40)#5,464
87.New Leipzig36.8%34.8%(+2.00)#8733.4%(+3.40)#5,466
88.Carrington36.0%34.8%(+1.20)#8833.4%(+2.60)#5,664
89.Ellendale36.0%34.8%(+1.20)#8933.4%(+2.60)#5,671
90.Aneta35.8%34.8%(+1.00)#9033.4%(+2.40)#5,730
91.Minnewaukan35.5%34.8%(+0.700)#9133.4%(+2.10)#5,821
92.Abercrombie34.9%34.8%(+0.100)#9233.4%(+1.50)#5,970
93.Wing34.9%34.8%(+0.100)#9333.4%(+1.50)#5,972
94.Parshall33.8%34.8%(-1.00)#9433.4%(+0.400)#6,260
95.Oakes33.6%34.8%(-1.20)#9533.4%(+0.200)#6,309
96.Mcclusky33.5%34.8%(-1.30)#9633.4%(+0.100)#6,359
97.Page33.1%34.8%(-1.70)#9733.4%(-0.300)#6,441
98.Mandan33.0%34.8%(-1.80)#9833.4%(-0.400)#6,447
99.Bismarck32.3%34.8%(-2.50)#9933.4%(-1.10)#6,628
100.Hunter31.5%34.8%(-3.30)#10033.4%(-1.90)#6,837

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota are:
#1
77.0%
#2
70.5%
#3
69.8%
#4
68.5%
#5
67.7%
#6
66.1%
#7
65.2%
#8
64.5%
#9
64.0%
#10
63.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota?
Beach has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota with 77.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota is 34.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.