Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.6415762.2%30.2%(+32.0)#3933.4%(+28.8)#953
2.6411959.2%30.2%(+29.0)#5833.4%(+25.8)#1,643
3.6415558.4%30.2%(+28.2)#6433.4%(+25.0)#1,846
4.6412353.8%30.2%(+23.6)#9433.4%(+20.4)#3,231
5.6412753.4%30.2%(+23.2)#9933.4%(+20.0)#3,381
6.6415653.3%30.2%(+23.1)#10033.4%(+19.9)#3,423
7.6413850.1%30.2%(+19.9)#12233.4%(+16.7)#4,521
8.6413145.6%30.2%(+15.4)#15833.4%(+12.2)#6,174
9.6413442.5%30.2%(+12.3)#18033.4%(+9.10)#7,342
10.6410940.0%30.2%(+9.80)#19733.4%(+6.60)#8,385
11.6411338.7%30.2%(+8.50)#20733.4%(+5.30)#8,937
12.6412438.4%30.2%(+8.20)#20933.4%(+5.00)#9,084
13.6413337.2%30.2%(+7.00)#21933.4%(+3.80)#9,596
14.6411235.5%30.2%(+5.30)#23133.4%(+2.10)#10,345
15.6410635.0%30.2%(+4.80)#23733.4%(+1.60)#10,534
16.6415133.3%30.2%(+3.10)#25433.4%(-0.100)#11,260
17.6410833.2%30.2%(+3.00)#25633.4%(-0.200)#11,308
18.6411431.4%30.2%(+1.20)#26833.4%(-2.00)#12,049
19.6411130.0%30.2%(-0.200)#28033.4%(-3.40)#12,591
20.6411628.9%30.2%(-1.30)#28933.4%(-4.50)#13,008
21.6410528.3%30.2%(-1.90)#29533.4%(-5.10)#13,256
22.6411827.8%30.2%(-2.40)#29933.4%(-5.60)#13,395
23.6413726.3%30.2%(-3.90)#31533.4%(-7.10)#13,933
24.6411022.9%30.2%(-7.30)#33933.4%(-10.5)#14,921
25.6415221.4%30.2%(-8.80)#36033.4%(-12.0)#15,617
26.6412821.0%30.2%(-9.20)#36333.4%(-12.4)#15,797
27.6414520.8%30.2%(-9.40)#36633.4%(-12.6)#15,941
28.6413218.8%30.2%(-11.4)#38233.4%(-14.6)#16,586

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO are:
#1
62.2%
#2
59.2%
#3
58.4%
#4
53.8%
#5
53.4%
#6
53.3%
#7
50.1%
#8
45.6%
#9
42.5%
#10
40.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
64157 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO with 62.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City is 30.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Missouri?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Missouri is 30.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.