Ugandan vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ugandan
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ugandans
Czechs
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.37%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Czech |
Minimum | 16.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.1% | 98.1% |
Mean | 28.4% | 27.9% |
Median | 27.1% | 27.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 29.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Turkish (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |