Ugandan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Hong Kong
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,815,844 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.36%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 16.6% | 7.8% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 44.2% |
Range | 31.1% | 36.3% |
Mean | 28.4% | 26.9% |
Median | 27.1% | 28.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 24.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Turkish (27.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |