Mongolian vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Mongolian
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Mongolians
Czechs
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,279,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Czech |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 42.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 38.6% | 98.1% |
| Mean | 26.7% | 27.9% |
| Median | 27.2% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.0% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 29.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |