Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 42.3% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 85.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.4% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 65.1% | 67.1% |
| Median | 66.8% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |