Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Immigrants from North America Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Immigrants from North America
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Immigrants from North America
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
20.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Immigrants from North America Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,193,298 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 42.3% | 37.5% |
| Maximum | 85.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.4% | 62.5% |
| Mean | 65.1% | 65.7% |
| Median | 66.8% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 54.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 73.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 16.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Paraguayans | 26.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 64.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
| Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |