Nepalese vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Nepalese
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Nepalese
Chickasaw
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,521,755 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 67.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 48.7% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 90.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.9% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 68.4% | 67.1% |
| Median | 69.5% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Nepalese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Thai (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (67.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Peru (67.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |