Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,677,474 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 37.9% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 97.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 60.0% |
Mean | 70.8% | 67.1% |
Median | 69.8% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.5% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |