Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Afghan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Afghan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Afghans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Afghan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,833,722 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 66.3%, a difference of 0.59%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Afghan |
Minimum | 42.3% | 42.2% |
Maximum | 85.6% | 91.7% |
Range | 43.4% | 49.5% |
Mean | 65.1% | 67.2% |
Median | 66.8% | 67.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 62.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 72.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Afghans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |