Latvian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Latvian
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Latvians
Pima
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,634,735 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 58.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 33.4% | 44.5% |
| Range | 31.8% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 19.9% |
| Median | 10.9% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Sri Lankan (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |