Latvian vs Pima Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Latvian
Pima
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Latvians
Pima
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Pima Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,200,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,518,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 109.5%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Pima |
Minimum | 2.0% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.0% | 95.6% |
Mean | 10.5% | 30.1% |
Median | 8.5% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 21.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 23.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czechoslovakian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (20.8%, a difference of 5.2%), Puerto Rican (21.4%, a difference of 8.1%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.3%, a difference of 8.3%), Lumbee (18.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and Immigrants from Cuba (17.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.9% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 16.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 17.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 17.5% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 19.8% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 21.4% |