Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Pima
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,551,406 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 48.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Pima |
Minimum | 0.20% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 21.3% | 44.5% |
Range | 21.1% | 35.9% |
Mean | 10.9% | 19.9% |
Median | 10.4% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Arab (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Lithuanian (10.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |