Costa Rican vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Pima
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,472,399 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 50.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Pima |
Minimum | 1.1% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 45.1% | 44.5% |
Range | 44.0% | 35.9% |
Mean | 12.6% | 19.9% |
Median | 10.3% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |