Greek vs Icelander Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Greek
Icelander
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Greeks
Icelanders
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Icelander Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,876,170 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,567,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
![Greek vs Icelander Self-Care Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/self-care-disability/greeks-vs-icelanders-self-care-disability-chart.webp)
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Icelander |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 15.0% |
Range | 49.4% | 14.6% |
Mean | 5.5% | 2.9% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Icelanders by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Slovene (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Carpatho Rusyn (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bhutanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Slovenes | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 93.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.4% |