British vs Choctaw Female Disability
COMPARE
British
Choctaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
British
Choctaw
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Choctaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,656,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 24.2%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.6% |
| Range | 93.8% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 23.8% |
| Median | 16.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 26.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.1% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to British by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
| Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
| Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |
| Italians | 10.7 /100 | #222 | Poor 12.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 9.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Belizeans | 9.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |