Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Average Family Size
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.14
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,605 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 3.16. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,446,712 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312 and weighted average of 3.14, a difference of 0.42%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 1.95 | 2.00 |
Maximum | 3.84 | 4.12 |
Range | 1.89 | 2.12 |
Mean | 3.03 | 2.97 |
Median | 3.13 | 3.01 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.79 | 2.79 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.29 | 3.21 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50 | 0.42 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.44 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.43 | 0.44 |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Germany (3.15, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (3.15, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.15, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Belgium (3.15, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Greek (3.14, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Norway (3.14, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Netherlands (3.14, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (3.14, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from France (3.15, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 |
New Zealanders | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.15 |
Cambodians | 0.6 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.15 |
Swiss | 0.5 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.15 |
Okinawans | 0.5 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.5 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | England | 0.4 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.4 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.15 |
Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.15 |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | France | 0.4 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.15 |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.3 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.14 |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 0.3 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.14 |
Greeks | 0.3 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.14 |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 0.3 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.14 |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.3 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.14 |