Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Raleigh
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh

3.1%
46.4%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 27605 46.4% 23.3% (+23.1)#74 21.6% (+24.8)#2,991
2. 27603 44.9% 23.3% (+21.6)#81 21.6% (+23.3)#3,187
3. 27606 42.1% 23.3% (+18.7)#92 21.6% (+20.5)#3,599
4. 27607 40.1% 23.3% (+16.7)#101 21.6% (+18.5)#3,897
5. 27604 26.0% 23.3% (+2.61)#215 21.6% (+4.36)#7,654
6. 27614 25.5% 23.3% (+2.20)#222 21.6% (+3.95)#7,787
7. 27609 24.5% 23.3% (+1.13)#241 21.6% (+2.88)#8,207
8. 27610 18.0% 23.3% (-5.32)#336 21.6% (-3.57)#11,209
9. 27601 17.1% 23.3% (-6.25)#357 21.6% (-4.50)#11,719
10. 27616 14.3% 23.3% (-9.01)#406 21.6% (-7.26)#13,268
11. 27612 14.1% 23.3% (-9.23)#409 21.6% (-7.48)#13,432
12. 27608 13.6% 23.3% (-9.78)#421 21.6% (-8.03)#13,755
13. 27613 12.8% 23.3% (-10.6)#436 21.6% (-8.84)#14,202
14. 27615 10.1% 23.3% (-13.3)#473 21.6% (-11.5)#15,842
15. 27617 3.1% 23.3% (-20.3)#556 21.6% (-18.5)#20,082

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC are:
#1
46.4%
#2
44.9%
#3
42.1%
#4
40.1%
#5
26.0%
#6
25.5%
#7
24.5%
#8
18.0%
#9
17.1%
#10
14.3%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC?
27605 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC with 46.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh, NC?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Raleigh is 29.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in North Carolina is 23.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.