Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Birth Rate | In Labor Force
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Raleigh
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh

80.0
12.0
Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1. 27605 12.0 46.0 (-34.0)#35 48.0 (-36.0)#1,075
2. 27616 19.0 46.0 (-27.0)#71 48.0 (-29.0)#2,324
3. 27617 25.0 46.0 (-21.0)#125 48.0 (-23.0)#3,946
4. 27615 34.0 46.0 (-12.0)#185 48.0 (-14.0)#6,587
5. 27607 38.0 46.0 (-8.00)#217 48.0 (-10.00)#7,904
6. 27612 39.0 46.0 (-7.00)#220 48.0 (-9.00)#8,201
7. 27603 42.0 46.0 (-4.00)#247 48.0 (-6.00)#9,158
8. 27613 43.0 46.0 (-3.00)#258 48.0 (-5.00)#9,521
9. 27610 44.0 46.0 (-2.00)#267 48.0 (-4.00)#9,824
10. 27601 45.0 46.0 (-1.000)#277 48.0 (-3.00)#10,301
11. 27606 50.0 46.0 (+4.00)#316 48.0 (+2.00)#11,684
12. 27604 50.0 46.0 (+4.00)#317 48.0 (+2.00)#11,691
13. 27614 50.0 46.0 (+4.00)#319 48.0 (+2.00)#11,720
14. 27609 62.0 46.0 (+16.0)#409 48.0 (+14.0)#14,824
15. 27608 80.0 46.0 (+34.0)#499 48.0 (+32.0)#17,935

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC are:
#1
12.0
#2
19.0
#3
25.0
#4
34.0
#5
38.0
#6
39.0
#7
42.0
#8
43.0
#9
44.0
#10
45.0
What zip code has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC?
27605 has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC with 12.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh, NC?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Raleigh is 40.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in North Carolina?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in North Carolina is 46.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States is 48.0.