South African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
No Vehicles in Household
South African No Vehicles in Household
10.2%
NO VEHICLES AVAILABLE
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,340,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 10.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.4% in percentage of households with no vehicle available.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with no vehicle available within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with no vehicle available due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants from Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
South African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African Data | No Vehicles in Household Data |
Minimum | 0.053% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 20.4% | 98.5% |
Mean | 4.2% | 10.5% |
Median | 3.0% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 19.6% |
Correlation Details
South African Percentile | Sample Size | No Vehicles in Household |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 173,791,008 | 12.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 5,930,947 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 1,536,755 | 7.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 528,195 | 6.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 171,248 | 5.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 147,778 | 3.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 66,607 | 5.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 54,260 | 5.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 19,696 | 4.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 31,804 | 5.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 20,824 | 5.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 11,047 | 7.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 4,717 | 7.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 9,651 | 7.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 4,946 | 6.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 4,450 | 5.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 3,541 | 1.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 377 | 7.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 1,841 | 4.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 65 | 5.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 985 | 7.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.50% | 161 | 100.0% |