Somali vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Somali
Immigrants from China
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Somalis
Immigrants from China
5.0%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,208,507 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,254,097 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 7.7% |
| Range | 17.2% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Somalis by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Kenya (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Indonesian (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Zaire (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Somalia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.2 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 95.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Indonesians | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Somalis | 94.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Kenyans | 93.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 93.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Paraguayans | 93.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 93.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 93.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 92.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Macedonians | 92.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |