Korean vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Korean
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Koreans
Choctaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
13.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,042,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 31.9% |
| Range | 32.2% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 7.2% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Creek (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
| Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
| Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 5.4% |
| South Americans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.4% |