Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Choctaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,584,627 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.89%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 7.6% | 31.9% |
Range | 6.1% | 30.0% |
Mean | 5.3% | 7.2% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.92% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.91% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |