Yuman vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Yuman
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Yuman
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
24.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
74.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,585,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 24.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,840,650 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 20.8%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.3% | 96.1% |
Mean | 35.9% | 20.5% |
Median | 27.4% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.2% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 43.3% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.7% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Creek (24.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Potawatomi (23.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (24.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Black/African American (24.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and Comanche (23.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 23.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 23.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 23.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 23.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 23.6% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 23.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 24.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 24.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 24.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 24.3% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 24.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 24.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 24.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Pakistani (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belize (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Yugoslavians | 79.0 /100 | #152 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Japan | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 19.8% |
Hungarians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 19.8% |
Danes | 75.5 /100 | #157 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 19.8% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 19.8% |
Pakistanis | 74.1 /100 | #160 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 74.1 /100 | #161 | Good 19.8% |
French Canadians | 73.0 /100 | #162 | Good 19.9% |
Malaysians | 72.7 /100 | #163 | Good 19.9% |
Central Americans | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 19.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 69.3 /100 | #165 | Good 19.9% |
Belgians | 69.1 /100 | #166 | Good 19.9% |