White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Fiji Family Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Immigrants from Fiji
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Immigrants from Fiji
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
56.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Fiji Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,742,503 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Immigrants from Fiji |
Minimum | 6.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 30.1% | 17.2% |
Range | 23.8% | 14.9% |
Mean | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Median | 11.9% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Immigrants from Fiji by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |