Turkish vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Luxembourgers
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
![Turkish vs Luxembourger Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/turks-vs-luxembourgers-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 18.7% | 13.1% |
Range | 16.3% | 12.7% |
Mean | 7.1% | 5.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.75%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Czech (7.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |