Turkish vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Luxembourger
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Turks
Luxembourgers
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,627,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,609,683 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.11% |
Maximum | 4.5% | 5.6% |
Range | 4.0% | 5.5% |
Mean | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Median | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Luxembourgers by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |