Immigrants from Korea vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Luxembourgers
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,824,351 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.76% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 17.2% | 13.1% |
Range | 16.4% | 12.7% |
Mean | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |