Immigrants from Singapore vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Luxembourgers
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,322,674 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 15.7% | 13.1% |
| Range | 15.0% | 12.7% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 5.5% |
| Median | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |