Turkish vs Immigrants from Pakistan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Pakistan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Pakistan
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Pakistan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,243,418 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 0.50% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 35.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 31.4% |
Mean | 13.5% | 14.6% |
Median | 11.2% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Pakistan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Russian (13.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.55%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.61%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |