Turkish vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Australian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Australians
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 8.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Australian |
Minimum | 0.50% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 60.2% |
Range | 71.4% | 54.9% |
Mean | 13.5% | 19.5% |
Median | 11.2% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |