Thai vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Thai
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Thais
Bhutanese
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,089,189 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.625 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 8.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.62% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 13.7% | 31.2% |
Range | 13.1% | 28.3% |
Mean | 5.8% | 8.9% |
Median | 5.2% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |