Immigrants from Lithuania vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Bhutanese
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.67%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 31.2% |
| Range | 15.8% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 8.9% |
| Median | 7.0% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |