Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from China
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,295,788 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 26.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 23.9% |
Mean | 13.5% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |