Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Liberia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Liberia
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 3.1% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 63.6% | 45.5% |
Range | 60.6% | 42.0% |
Mean | 20.2% | 16.9% |
Median | 17.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Immigrants from Liberia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |