Potawatomi vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Ecuadorian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Ecuadorians
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.16%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 3.1% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 63.6% | 28.7% |
Range | 60.6% | 28.5% |
Mean | 20.2% | 14.8% |
Median | 17.8% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Ecuadorians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |